• Home
  • Topics
  • Articles in Lawyer
  • Authors
  • Articles by Mumtaz Shah
  • Feed 
  • Sitemap



  • Partners:

    Articles on PDA
    Submit your software
    TNX.net: Sell links on every page of your site to thousands of advertisers!
    Sape.ru: Sell links on your website
    LinkFeed.ru: buy and sell links on your website




    Translations:

    Personal Injury Lawyer - Do We Need Them?

    by Mumtaz Shah

    Following an you'll hear a say that they don't need to see a , TOO expensive! In this we will set out for you some reasons why NOT seeking, at minimum, a with an could end up costing you a of !

    More often than not, regardless of whether you caused the or are its , if you do not seek a with an as soon as possible after the you may well end up regretting your . The overriding reasons for saying this are two-:

    • the you will be making your against are trying to their losses; and

    • you most probably don't know what you're entitled to.

    As A Of An

    Let's assume you are the of an unfortunate . Let's further assume that your has come through and has agreed to all your medical bills. Now, you may well be that your are the good guys and you don't need a 's . Wrong!

    What's happened is less than what the is obligated to do under the terms and conditions of your . Moreover, the is hoping to play on the that you feel somewhat indebted to their .

    That , they hope, you'll not bring about a bigger for what you are rightly entitled to. In the long run that means that they don't have quiet as an and they can still make a from your .

    In short, they are protecting their financial wellbeing at the of your . But, unless you have spoken to a you'll not know this and you'll feel that everything is .

    So, the next time you are in an or , ask yourself this : 'Is my interested in protecting me and my , or are they more concerned with paying a to their shareholders?'

    Non-

    On the other , a is normally an ethical impartial who knows what your are. Aside from possibly paid a , not from or by you, he's also likely to have another to a better than its' , (and, keep in , if any proceedings occur, these fees are reclaimed from the ).

    So, why shouldn't they tell you the about what you are entitled to? What's more, even if he does have a financial in your , surely the better compensated you are, the better compensated he is?

    As such, if , he has even more in making sure that you know exactly what your are and of making sure that you for those according to what you are entitled to.

    Looked at it like this, it not too to see who the interested party is and who the independent party is. Now ask yourself: 'Do you want to take from who is interested in minimising your , or who is interested in maximising it?'

    Of An

    Now let's at it from the of view of, you the at in the . You may well feel that you have to , as your will for the done. You may even find that initially your agrees with this. But why...?

    Unless you see an as soon as possible after the you'll never know. Why? Are you 100% sure that it was your ...?

    Polite

    The has to be polite, you're their ! However, once the is over and you're thrilled with their , you're definitely going to renew your . But the extra of hundred they ask for will justify the ? 'Sir/ma'am, you had an and your premium has increased!'

    Knowing exactly what your or obligations are after an can be extremely tricky. In most cases it will depend on what happened to the in the first .

    As such, seeking the of a as soon as you can following an is the only independent you can really determine and know exactly what you are entitled to or what you may be liable for arising from the .

    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


    Comments

    There are no comments so far.